Just returned from an eight day visit to London as part of a Rick Steves Europe tour group. The group was 26 folks strong including our most excellent guide. This was my first visit to London and all I can say is, "wow!" We had a wonderful time. Most memorable were visits to Westminster Abby, St. Paul Cathedral and St. George's Chapel. I could actually feel the weight of history as I walked through those magnificent buildings. An additional show stopper was the trip to Greenwich to visit the Royal Observatory and to stand on the Prime Meridian. As a mariner for a majority of my professional life, navigation was one of the primary areas of expertise which was learned early on and put into practice each and every day. It was wonderful to visit Greenwich and learn how it came to be that the Prime Meridian was set there and to learn the major role accurate timepieces had in the advancement of navigation.
The tour covered many additional sights throughout the city. From just about any location we visited, the skyline views of the city were amazing. And we also very much enjoyed how easy it was to get around. Years earlier, we had lived in downtown Tokyo and loved the ease of movement throughout that huge metropolitan. Subways, trains, buses, cabs in abundance. London is the same. It seems we were never more than an eight to ten minute (leizurely) walk to some form of transportation. Super convenient!
Armed with two digital cameras, a film camera and two iPhone 13s, between us we captured 2,000 images! While it seemed fun at the time, culling through those images a week after returning home has proven quite challenging. And in the end I want to get the pile down to about 50 (or so) images for a photo book. Wish me luck...
Prior to the trip I agonized for months on lens choice. In the end. I bought along a 15mm, 28mm and a 50mm. The 28mm and 50mm seemed like no brainers and were the lenses I used most of the time. Probably a 65/35 split with the 28mm being most used. I brought the 15mm in anticipation of interior shots, mostly at the three holy sites mentioned above. However, 15mm was just too hard for me to manage. If the sites had been empty I think I would have focused on the magnificent ceilings in those buildings. I just couldn't get out of the way of the lens. And, the distortion and perspective issues of not holding the lens perpendicular or at least level, proved my undoing. My fault for not regularly using the lens to learn how to use it effectively - lesson learned. In its place, I used my iPhone 13. At some point I will publish a ranting post on just how easily modern smart phones capture images. I have been truly amazed by some of the straight out of phone images I've taken in situations that I know my modern and very expensive digital cameras would have choked on. Certainly you can do a lot in post processing to make the camera images look equally, if not more so, amazing. But at the moment of capture, "chimping" the shot to show your family / friends, the iPhones can sometimes win. But I'll save that rant for another time.
Back to lens choice. Later this year my wife and I will again travel to Europe and I'm just now entering the period where I will begin agonizing over the perfect lens combination for the trip. A fast zoom lens would be the best choice but that isn't really an option for the camera system I am bought into. Instead, small, fast prime lenses are the choice. So, for this next trip I'm thinking a 24mm, 50mm (40mm?) and a 90mm. Why the 90mm? I noticed as I have been working through the images captured in London I am often cropping into some images to highlight a particular aspect. The 50mm was my longest lens and in some cases it just doesn't have the reach. I think the 90mm will give me the necessary reach while maintaining sensor resolution. On the shorter end, 24mm will be perfect for walking the streets in the downtown areas. I shoot a lot of architectural images and noticed in London that 28mm, although my favorite focal length, was often not quite wide enough for the scene. I am a "scenes" photographer more than I am a "subject" photographer. Better for me to capture a bit more and crop it out that to miss something I want included. I'm still thinking this through (actually, I'm agonizing over it - fear of missing out!) and have plenty of time before the trip. Regardless, between now and then I will spend a lot of time with the 24mm and the 90mm and become very comfortable with those focal lengths.
A process I did enjoy executing was shooting panos with the 50mm lens. And that is a technique I practiced before the trip to London. Shooting three or four (or sometimes just two) images, with about 30% to 40% overlap, and stitching them together in Capture One has been a game changer for me. I used to think I needed wide angle lenses for landscape (nature or urban) images. However, I believe I like shooting the 50mm better in those situations and stitching in post. More compression with the same field of view. While the images can be captured in either horizontal or vertical aspect, I tend to shoot mostly horizontal. Probably because it is most comfortable for me with the camera I use. Regardless, if you haven't tried this technique, go for it! I've also shot panos with the 90mm as well and was equally please with the results.
Finally, several years ago I bought an Ona Bowery camera bag. Almost from when the bag arrived to my home, I began second guessing the choice as I thought it too small. And in the months leading up to the trip I became more concerned about its size in relation to the kit I was planning. So, I began taking the bag on the many photowalks I regularly take in my local downtown with some version of the kit I through I'd use in London. Often I'd return home convinced I needed a slightly larger messenger type bag. On a few occasions I nearly pulled the trigger. However, it turned out that the one camera body with a lens attached, plus the two other small, fast prime lenses, two spare batteries and a few SD cards all fit comfortably in the Ona Bowery bag. Slung cross body and carried slightly behind, I never had issues with the security of my kit and could access it very quickly on those few occasions when I wanted to swap a lens. The camera was usually on a wrist strap but even when on a neck strap there was no interference with the Ona Bowery. I'll admit it looks a bit like a man-purse but I decided to be brave and not worry about how it looked. Turns out that with its small size, and in black, it is mostly invisible. And it fit into the backpack I hand carried onto my flights there and back. I'm not sponsored by anyone but I will say that if you are looking for a small bag for your camera kit, take a look at the Ona Bowery.
Below are just a few of my favorite images.
No comments:
Post a Comment